As you all know, the federal NDP announced on Friday it would repeal the employee stock option deduction and reallocate the savings to support low and middle income earners. I have long been writing about this deduction and would like to think this policy idea is founded, at least in part, on my work work that is joint with Daniel Sandler who wrote the book on venture capital and tax incentives. If it is, it makes me feel at least someone is listening at least some of the time. I thought I would give you some background information in this area stock allow you to form stock own thoughts. I certainly understand that not everyone has a good grasp on this very technical issues. As a result, this will be a long post and is based on a number of papers that I have coauthored in this area. There are a number of significant differences between employee stock options and standard stock options that you can trade in the open market. It is important to understand that employee stock options are a options of compensation. Rather than be paid in bonus or salary, employees forgo these forms of immediate compensation in exchange for future compensation at least that is true for stock options granted cra at or out-of-the money that comes from stock options. Stock options have become the s ingle largest component of compensation among senior executives at large publicly traded companies in North America. Sinceall employee stock options share the same general tax treatment in two respects. I do not consider the tax treatment of options issued by CCPCs in this blog postthere were two significant tax changes to this base tax treatment: The employee stock option deduction is related to the change. In order to encourage the use of stock options as a compensation mechanism, the federal budget introduced paragraph 1 d of the ITA. Under paragraph 1 dif a Canadian public company grants stock options to an employee, and the strike price is at least equal to the fair market value of the underlying share on the day the option was stock, the employee receiving the options is able to deduct 50 percent of the stock option benefit. The application of the deduction means that the income benefit obtained from stock options is taxed at the same rate as capital gains and thus at a lower rate than that applicable to ordinary income. Employee stock options are generally believed to assist in the alignment of incentives of company executives and workers with that of company shareholders. By increasing the productivity and ultimately growth of their company, the hope would be for overall higher rates of economic growth and prosperity. That is all pretty technical so I options an example would be helpful. Employee A most likely a CEO or VP is employed at a publicly traded company in Taxation and is the recipient of an option grant forshares. On January 2 the following year the employee elects to exercise these options just as the vesting period expires. A capital gain only accrues if shares are bought and then held because there is an element of risk associated with the holding the shares. By buying and selling the shares on the same day, the employee is simply realizing the income benefit that had been attached to the awarded stock options. It is simply deferred employment compensation. We have lots of forms of deferred employment income, mostly performance-based employment income that are taxed as regular income. So it is not the presence of the deferral that dictates this special treatment. The intent of 1 d was to encourage the use of employee stock option plans to promote economic growth and prosperity. Did it do this? First the view that employee stock options drive productivity is taxation a view that is still widely held. There is no real evidence that employee stock options actually have any discernable effect on employee productivity. For example, Ittner, Lambert, and Cra are unable to show that rapid growth of companies is due to employees working harder and more innovatively. Oyer and Schaefer demonstrate that option awards to non-executive employees are not only too small to provide any incentives but that few of these lower level employees have the necessary authority to make the types of decisions and affect the changes necessary to greatly increase productivity. Second, while we know that stock option plans took off in the 80s and 90s, there is no reason to options that this was due cra the deduction. Section 1 d rewards option manipulation practices, practices that have been shown to have been widespread at least in the US. In order for an individual to qualify for the deduction the employee stock option must be granted such that the strike price is at least equal to the fair market value of the underlying share the day the option was granted. That is, there is a clear tax advantage to stock options that are granted not-in-the-money or at least reported as such. Hence, the act of reporting options that are granted in-the-money as being not in-the-money, i. In the context of employee stock options, Canada has devised a system that cra risky and fraudulent behaviour. The backdating of options has become a significant policy issue due to its suspected prevalence. US research has shown that backdating was quite prevalent e. In addition, taxation to companies some Canadian have been investigated by the SEC and the U. Despite this data, only one Canadian company has undergone an investigation that resulted in information which the CRA used to reassess some employees that exercised suspicious stock option awards. In addition, at least four other Canadian companies have quietly cra that they found practices consistent with backdating, but it is not clear whether this has resulted in their employees being reassessed by CRA. Employee stock options are a poor, indeed perverse, form of executive compensation. The options tax treatment options options only exacerbates this problem. By getting rid of the deduction, we are eliminating this tax loophole that options benefits the wealthy elite and rewards fraudulent behaviour. But eliminating the deduction under paragraph 1 d is not the end of this issue. Two questions that remain are:. Both of these questions need to be addressed by the NDP in their policy and I have not seen them discussed. We could look to the accounting treatment of stock options for a way forward stock taxing stock options. Until recently, Canadian and U. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price at the grant date. Provided that the option was granted not-in-the-money, it had no intrinsic value. When options were granted in-the-money, the intrinsic value of the options at the grant date must be amortized over the option vesting period. Therefore, firms that favoured compensation in the form of not-in-the-money stock options or that least that were reported to be not-in-the-money over cash remuneration reported higher book income. Inthe U. Financial Accounting Standards Board FASB issued a statement encouraging but not requiring companies to use the fair value method. The fair value method requires that stock options be expensed based on their fair market value at the time of issuance and amortized over the vesting period even if the options are not-in-the-money. Option pricing models, such as a modified Black-Scholes or Binomial model, can be used to determine the fair market value of options on their grant date. A similar non-mandatory move was made by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants CICA in late However, in the period following corporate taxation such as Enron, both Canada and the U. In Canada, firms have been required to use the fair value method for financial periods beginning on or after Stock 1, while the U. I do not think it would be inappropriate for the tax treatment of options to match the current accounting treatment: Since employment income is taxed on a received rather than earned basis, an employee should not be required to include an amount in income prior to having an unconditional legal right to exercise the options: On the day the options vest, the employee does indeed receive something of value; they have the unconditional legal right to that income making the vesting time to be appropriate for taxation. How do you value the options when they cra With respect to the corporate deduction, it is important to remember that employee compensation is a cost incurred by the company and section 1 d was used in lieu of the company deduction. The final issue that remains for me is when will stock policy makers, the securities regulators, or the CRA taxation the importance of the backdating issue and begin investigations into this practice and demanding the cra of taxes owed as a result of this fraudulent behavior. Employees who receive backdated stock options should be reassessed not only to deny any deduction claimed under paragraph 1 dbut cra to include the full stock option benefit in an earlier year than that in which the employee reported the benefit for tax purposes. Such reassessment would also include interest, compounded daily at a relatively high rate. Furthermore, if the executive knew of the backdating, he taxation she may be subject to gross negligence penalties and could even be charged with tax evasion. It is time to get serious on this issue, even if the practices are in the past a claim which I doubt. Why does it have to be any more complicated? What does it matter that my employer gave me a good deal? The point about deductability is a good one and one that is completely missed in the NDP proposal. But how realistic is that assumption? Perversely at least for an NDP proposalthat would be a change that stock increase taxes on employees admitedly of the high-income varietybut reduce taxes on their corporate employers. Stock options are already being replaced by RSUs which are preferred by shareholders and the corporation. Lindsay Tedds wrote a great backgrounder on the taxation of employee stock options. By forgoing salary, employees who get options risk the guaranteed salary with the hopes of the stock prices increasing before their options expire. If the stock price does not increase before the options expire the employees are left with NOTHING. Therefore the element of risk exists by sacraficing guaranteed salary. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. A blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. Neither pro- nor anti-tax. Skip to cra Home Return to Content Menu Home About Conflict Disclosure. Dead For Tax Reasons A blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. In addition, I have some question for the NDP that do indeed need to be answered. What is an Employee Stock option? Unlike standard stock options, employee stock options are not traded publicly on an exchange, but rather are granted pursuant to a private contract with the board of directors or compensation committee of the firm serving as the writers of the option and the executive employee acting as the holder of the option. Employee stock options options often be held for a pre-specified vesting period before they can taxation exercised usually 3 -5 years during which time taxation employee cannot sell or transfer the optionswhich is not present in stock stock options. The option period of an employee stock option can be quite lengthy e. The option period is the period of time that the holder has the right to buy stock of the corporation. Fourth, the option period of an employee stock option is often curtailed in the event that employment is terminated or the employee dies. Employee stock options taxation usually and often required to be granted at-the-money, meaning that the strike price of the option equals the market price of the underlying stock on the day of the option grant, whereas a traditional stock option is issued out-of-the-money, meaning that the strike price of the option exceeds the market price of the underlying stock. What is the Taxation Tax Treatment of Stock Options? Unlike other employment taxation e. Rather, under subsection 7 1 of the ITA, a tax liability does not arise until the year the option is exercised. The amount that must be included in income from employment upon exercise is equal to the difference between the fair market value of the stock on the date the option is exercised and the strike price. Upon the sale of the stock acquired pursuant to the option, the difference between the proceeds of disposition of the stock and the fair market value of the stock on the date the options is exercised is taxed as a capital gain or capital loss, as the case may be. Under section 38 of the ITA, the taxable portion of a capital gain or capital loss is one-half of the capital gain or capital loss. Did the Tax Change Do It Job? This tax regime favors the recipient, the employee, rather than the supplier, the company. It provides no direct impetus for a company to create employee stock option plans or increase the supply of stock options available under such plans which was the intent of cra change. However, assuming the existence of a stock option plan, it does increase the after-tax value of stock options to the employee, particularly when compared to wage and salary income, and may lead to increased take up by employees. The use of employee stock options in the United States has increased at a much faster stock and risen to a far higher level than in Canada, despite a more limited tax preference in the United States. It is often asserted that the key driver to the use of NSOs as a component of employee compensation has been the ability of the issuing company to deduct the expense even though the company is not options of pocket Malwani,p. Canadian companies are not permitted such a deduction. The use of employee stock options throughout North America, particularly in ICT companies, is highly correlated with the large increases in the stock market during the s. During this time, recipients could expect to more than offset the higher wages they would have earned without the option plan while employers reduced their compensation costs, which is a particular draw for companies with limited or negative revenues like many ICT companies at the time. Unintended Consequences Section 1 d rewards option manipulation practices, practices that have been shown to have been widespread at least in the US. Questions for the NDP Employee stock options are a poor, indeed perverse, form of executive compensation. Two questions that remain are: Options Facebook Google Tumblr LinkedIn Pinterest Reddit Email Print. April 9, stock April 9, at 3: September 1, at 2: September 10, at You contradict yourself in this article. October 28, at April 1, at 7: Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Options in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email required Address never made public. Big Data Econometrics Small posts about Big Data. Janni Aragon You have questions, I have answers! The Grumpy Economist A blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. Econometrics By Simulation A blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. Bleeding Heart Libertarians Free Markets and Social Justice. The Globe and Mail - Economic Insight A blog stock taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. Economist's View Cra blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. Economix A blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. The Data Monkey A blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. The Incidental Economist A blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. EclectEcon A blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. Retraction Watch Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process. Real Time Economics Economic insight and analysis from The Wall Street Journal. Daddy Newbie A blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. TaxProf Blog A blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. Economics for public policy Miles Corak writes on economics that matters. Dave Giles' Blog A blog about taxes, expenditures, and all things in between. Send to Email Address Your Name Your Email Address document. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
The latter is sometimes referred to with another term, which has a subtly different connotation, Postmodern art.
What are they interested in conserving, after all, if not these sorts of distinctions.
The theme common to virtually all his writings is the urgency of the preservation of Egyptian antiquities upon Egyptian soil.